Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Farooqi Begum (D) By LRs. vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Civil AppealDecided 12 Jul 2022
Civil Appeal No. 1534 of 2009

Background

The dispute concerned about 20 bighas of land in a grove called "Bagh Hazoor Pasand" in Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, historically granted rent-free by the former Nawab of Rampur to one of his wives, and said to have been resumed by his successor decades before the princely state's merger with India. The State of U.P. sued Farooqi Begum's family (as successor of the original grantee) for declaration and possession, claiming the land had been resumed and vested in the State, while the defendant claimed continuous possession since 1924 and rights as a "Bhumidhar" under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The trial court decreed the suit for the State, and both the first appeal and a second appeal to the Allahabad High Court were dismissed.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court found that the High Court had erred by relying on inadmissible or irrelevant evidence and had wrongly placed the burden of proof on the defendant-appellant, without carefully scrutinising the actual evidentiary record, including doubtful testimony purportedly proving the defendant's signature on a key letter. The Court declined to independently rule on the substantive question of whether a Muslim husband's gift to his wife during marriage is irrevocable, holding that this required fresh consideration by the High Court on remand. It allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and restored the Second Appeal to the High Court's file for fresh disposal in light of its observations.

Lesson Learnt

Appellate courts must carefully weigh the actual evidence on record and correctly allocate the burden of proof before deciding a title dispute; a judgment based on misplaced burden or unreliable evidence can be set aside and sent back for a proper fresh hearing, even decades into the litigation.

Farooqi Begum (D) By LRs. vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware