Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Foundation for Innovation and Research in Science and Technology First vs. Deep Algorithms Pvt Ltd & Anr.

Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8329Decided 24 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
ARB.P. 1714/2026CNR: DLHC010457602026
Justice Manoj Jain

Background

Under a Share Purchase Agreement, the petitioner had sold shares of Deep Algorithms Pvt. Ltd. to an individual buyer, with a clause entitling the petitioner to the price difference if the buyer later resold shares at a higher price within 18 months. The petitioner claimed this "more favourable price" clause was triggered and a large differential amount (over Rs. 4.92 crore) was owed but unpaid, prompting it to seek appointment of an arbitrator.

Decision Breakdown

The buyer's counsel argued no violation of the price-adjustment clause had occurred and the company should not have been impleaded since the agreement was only between the petitioner and the individual buyer, but agreed, without prejudice to these objections, to proceed to arbitration. With the consent of the petitioner and the individual respondent, the Court referred the dispute between them to arbitration and appointed a former judge of the High Court as sole arbitrator, leaving all rights and contentions open.

Lesson Learnt

Even where a respondent disputes that any breach occurred, a court exercising its Section 11 arbitrator-appointment power will not adjudicate the merits of the dispute: it simply enforces the parties' agreement to arbitrate and leaves the substantive dispute to the arbitrator.

Foundation for Innovation and Research in Science and Technology First vs. Deep Algorithms Pvt Ltd & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware