Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawSupreme Court of India

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.

Civil Appeal · 2019 INSC 511Decided 10 Apr 2019
Civil Appeal No. 3631 of 2019
Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman · Justice Vineet Saran

Background

Garware Wall Ropes had given a sub-contract to Coastal Marine for coastal-protection work in Odisha; the sub-contract agreement contained an arbitration clause. After a dispute arose and Garware terminated the contract, Coastal Marine tried to appoint an arbitrator, but Garware objected and refused. Coastal Marine then approached the Bombay High Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to have an arbitrator appointed; the High Court allowed this despite the underlying sub-contract agreement not being properly stamped (i.e., stamp duty had not been paid on it) under the Maharashtra Stamp Act. Garware appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that a court cannot act on an arbitration clause contained in an unstamped document.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that while an arbitration clause in an unregistered document can still be enforced (since the Registration Act has a special carve-out for such clauses), the same is not true for an unstamped document: the Indian Stamp Act requires courts to examine whether a document is duly stamped before acting on it "as a whole," including any arbitration clause within it, and this requirement was not displaced by a 2016 amendment (Section 11(6A)) to the Arbitration Act. The Court explained that under the Contract Act, an unstamped agreement is not yet enforceable in law and therefore cannot technically be a "contract" containing a valid arbitration clause. It laid down a practical procedure: when a court is asked to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 and finds the underlying document unstamped, it must first impound the document and send it to the stamp authorities, who should decide the stamp-duty issue (preferably within 45 days), after which the Section 11 application can proceed. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Bombay High Court's order, and sent the matter back to be decided following this procedure.

Lesson Learnt

A business contract containing an arbitration clause must be properly stamped under state stamp law before a court will even appoint an arbitrator under it: unpaid stamp duty is not a mere technicality and can delay or block enforcement of an otherwise valid arbitration agreement until it is cured.

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware