Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Gautam Kumar Das vs NCT of Delhi

Not available · 2024 INSC 610Decided 20 Aug 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Background

The appellant's wife died of COVID-19 in April 2021, just ten days after their daughter was born; he lost his father to COVID-19 shortly after. Overwhelmed by grief, he temporarily handed his infant daughter's care to his sister-in-law while he continued raising his older son. When he later remarried and sought his daughter back, his sister-in-law and her sister refused to return the child and moved her to West Bengal. He approached the Delhi High Court seeking custody, but the High Court merely granted liberty to approach the family court instead of deciding the matter itself.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, as the child's only surviving natural parent, had a legal right to her custody, relying on its earlier ruling in Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari. It found that temporary care by relatives during a family crisis does not extinguish a natural guardian's rights, and that allegations against the father appeared to be an afterthought raised only once he began asserting his claim. The Court set aside the High Court's order, directed immediate handover of the child to her father, while allowing the relatives supervised visitation every Wednesday.

Lesson Learnt

A biological parent does not lose the right to custody of a child merely because relatives cared for the child during a period of family tragedy; the child's welfare and the natural guardian's rights remain paramount once that period has passed.

Gautam Kumar Das vs NCT of Delhi – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware