Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The respondents (original plaintiffs) had filed a civil suit in 1988 seeking a declaration of title and recovery of possession over certain agricultural land. The petitioners (original defendants) resisted the suit by claiming that the respondents had earlier agreed, under an unregistered sale agreement dated 25-11-1968, to sell them a small portion of the land (2 guntas out of survey No. 24/9) for Rs. 850, and that they had been in possession ever since, invoking the "part-performance" protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Trial Court and the First Appellate Court both ruled in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents, and the Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioners' Second Appeal, upholding those findings. The petitioners then approached the Supreme Court by way of a Special Leave Petition.
The Supreme Court held that the petitioners had failed to prove that the respondents had actually executed the 1968 sale agreement or put them in possession pursuant to it: a factual finding consistently returned by all three lower fora based on oral and documentary evidence, which the Court found no reason to disturb. The Court reiterated the legal prerequisites for claiming protection under Section 53-A: there must be a written, signed contract for transfer of the property with reasonably certain terms, the transferee must have taken or continued in possession in part-performance of that contract, and the transferee must have performed or been willing to perform their own obligations under it. Since the underlying sale agreement itself was not proved, none of these prerequisites were met, so Section 53-A's protection was unavailable and the Court also noted this exception to the formal-registration requirement must be strictly construed. Finding no error of law in the High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (after condoning delay in filing it) and disposed of any pending applications.
A claim of "part-performance" possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act only protects a person who can actually prove a genuine written sale agreement and their own readiness to perform it: mere long-standing possession of land, without proof of the underlying contract, will not defeat the true owner's title.
