Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
After the Electricity Act, 2003 reorganised Orissa's power sector, GRIDCO's transmission business moved to a new entity (OPTCL) while GRIDCO continued as the bulk-supply/distribution licensee, alongside four regional distribution companies (WESCO, NESCO, SESCO and CESCO). Over multiple years, the state Regulatory Commission passed a series of tariff orders (fixing the annual revenue requirement, bulk supply tariff, transmission tariff and retail supply tariff), and both the Commission, GRIDCO, OPTCL and the DISCOMS repeatedly cross-appealed these orders to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity and then to the Supreme Court, spanning financial years from 2006-2007 up to 2014-2015. By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, 17 separate but interlinked appeals, filed at different times by different parties challenging different Tribunal orders, needed to be resolved together.
The Supreme Court first clarified that its jurisdiction under Section 125 of the Electricity Act is narrow, limited to substantial questions of law (as under Section 100 of the CPC), so it would not reopen concurrent factual findings of the expert Commission and the Appellate Tribunal, both bodies staffed with technical and judicial expertise, and treated tariff-fixation under Section 62 as a quasi-judicial function. On the substantive disputes, the Court held that only the interest component of GRIDCO's loans (not the principal repayment) could be passed through to consumers via the tariff, that GRIDCO's earnings from exporting surplus power outside the state must be counted as its revenue rather than excluded, and that adjustments for increased power purchase quantities (Simultaneous Maximum Demand) had to be properly factored into tariff calculations. It modified the orders in two of the appeals accordingly and dismissed the remaining appeals, while directing the Commission to implement all the Tribunal's orders as now modified and to pass fresh consequential orders, clarifying that a later cancellation of the DISCOMS' licenses would not affect the tariff fixation for these earlier years.
Courts hearing statutory appeals from specialised regulatory tribunals (like electricity tariff bodies) generally defer to their factual and technical findings and intervene only on genuine questions of law; and in cost pass-through arrangements, a lender's interest cost can be recovered from consumers but the underlying loan principal itself generally cannot be treated as a pass-through expense.
