Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A residential site in Bangalore, allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) to the first defendant under a lease-cum-sale agreement in 1979, became the subject of a 1982 agreement in which the first defendant promised to sell it to the plaintiff once she obtained her own sale deed from the BDA. When the first defendant later refused to execute the sale (claiming the plaintiff was in breach and forfeiting his advance), the plaintiff sued for specific performance. The first defendant died during the suit; her son eventually got a sale deed from the BDA and then sold the same property to a second defendant. The Trial Court refused specific performance and only ordered the refund of the plaintiff's payment, but the High Court reversed this and directed execution of the sale deed in the plaintiff's favour.
The Supreme Court held that the underlying 1982 agreement was itself tainted with illegality: the site had been allotted by BDA specifically to house a homeless person, but the plaintiff, a contractor who admitted he intended to resell it through a nominee for profit, had no genuine intention to use it for that purpose, making the agreement unenforceable under the law governing such public housing allotments. The Court found the High Court erred in holding the suit for specific performance maintainable at all, and set aside its judgment restoring the sale deed to the plaintiff. However, since the defendants had not challenged the Trial Court's original decree, and to do complete justice between the parties using its Article 142 powers, the Court did not simply dismiss the case: it directed the appellants to pay the plaintiff's legal representatives Rs. 20,00,000 (in place of a full refund) within three months, with 8% annual interest if delayed, in lieu of returning the property.
An agreement to sell land or a site that was itself allotted by a public authority for a specific public-welfare purpose (like housing) can be struck down as unenforceable if the buyer never intended to use it for that purpose but instead planned to resell for profit; courts can still use their equitable powers to ensure some fair monetary compensation even while refusing to enforce an illegal bargain.
