Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawDelhi High Court

Gurvinder Singh and Ors. vs. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Criminal Miscellaneous Case · CNR No. DLHC010820252024Decided 16 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
CRL.M.C. 9102/2024CNR: DLHC010820252024
Justice Manoj Jain

Background

The petitioners sought quashing of a 2015 FIR lodged by the wife against her husband's family after the marriage broke down. The dispute had actually been resolved at the Delhi Mediation Centre back in 2018, and the couple divorced by mutual consent in 2019, but the quashing petition itself was filed only much later due to the petitioners' financial constraints.

Decision Breakdown

The wife appeared in person and confirmed the settlement terms, a total of Rs 2,00,000 in lieu of alimony and maintenance, but pointed out that the final Rs 50,000 instalment, due in 2019, had only now been paid, and asked that the petitioners be penalised for the delay. The petitioners agreed to pay an additional Rs 25,000 for the delay. The Court quashed the FIR, but made the quashing conditional on the petitioners actually depositing this additional Rs 25,000 into the wife's bank account within five weeks.

Lesson Learnt

Courts quashing a settled matrimonial case will hold the settling party to full and prompt compliance, including penalising unreasonable delay in paying agreed settlement amounts, even years after the original agreement.

Gurvinder Singh and Ors. vs. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware