Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Two tenants of commercial shops in Madhya Pradesh, paying rents fixed decades earlier (Rs. 622 and Rs. 847 per month, set in 1975), lost eviction suits filed by their landlady on grounds unrelated to non-payment of rent, and their appeals were dismissed by the lower appellate court. While their second appeals were pending in the High Court, the landlady sought mesne profits (compensation for continued occupation) and the High Court, relying on a Rent Controlling Authority report on prevailing market rates, directed the tenants to pay Rs. 18,000 per month pending the second appeals, failing which their stay against eviction would be vacated. The tenants challenged this, arguing that Section 13 of the Act, which lets a tenant retain protection during appeal by depositing rent at the earlier agreed rate, should govern instead of a market-rate mesne profits order.
The Supreme Court undertook a detailed analysis of Section 13's legislative history and held that depositing rent under Section 13 protects a tenant only from having their defence struck out or the appeal dismissed for default. It does not amount to, or substitute for, a stay of the eviction decree itself. Following its own precedents in Atma Ram Properties v. Federal Motors and State of Maharashtra v. Super Max International, the Court held that an appellate court exercising its equitable discretion under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC to stay execution of an eviction decree retains independent power to impose reasonable conditions, including requiring payment of a market-rate mesne profit higher than the old contractual rent, since the landlord is otherwise being deprived of the fruits of a decree already won in two courts. The Court declined to let the tenants reopen the correctness of the Rs. 18,000 figure itself at this stage, but modified the High Court's order to give the tenants five weeks to pay (adjusting sums already deposited) and directed that only Rs. 10,000 per month be released to the landlady immediately, with the balance held pending final outcome, consistent with the safeguard recognised in Super Max International for a tenant who might ultimately win the appeal.
A tenant who has lost an eviction case in two courts cannot rely on statutory rent-deposit protections meant to prevent default-based dismissal as a shield against paying realistic, market-rate compensation for continuing to occupy the property while an appeal is pending: an appellate court has independent equitable power to set such terms when staying execution of an eviction decree.
