Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Hem Raj was a passenger in a car stopped at a police checkpoint in Himachal Pradesh in December 2014, where police recovered over 4 kg of charas (cannabis resin) hidden below his seat. He and the car's driver were convicted under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), and 25 read with 29, of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, and sentenced to 12 years' rigorous imprisonment plus fines for each offence (later reduced to 10 years by the High Court, with sentences running concurrently). Hem Raj did not challenge his conviction but argued before the Supreme Court that he should not have received separate punishments (and separate fines) for offences under Section 20 and under Sections 25/29, since they arose from the same single transaction.
The Supreme Court held that Sections 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act do prescribe independent, separately imposable punishment by "legislation by reference". They incorporate the punishment scale of the underlying substantive offence (here, Section 20) rather than leaving the offences unpunishable. However, it clarified that where such offences arise from the same transaction, courts should, as a rule of wisdom, direct the sentences to run concurrently to avoid double jeopardy, which the trial court had already done. On the separate question of fines, the Court held that unlike prison sentences, a fine is itself a form of punishment under Section 53 IPC, and once the substantive sentences run concurrently, the convict cannot be compelled to pay the fine twice for what is effectively one criminal transaction. Since Hem Raj had already served about 11 years (including default imprisonment for non-payment) and was not required to pay the fine again, the Court ordered his immediate release.
Even when a single criminal transaction technically breaches multiple sections of a law (such as separate NDPS provisions for possession and control), courts should order sentences to run concurrently and should not require a convict to pay the associated fine more than once for what is really one course of conduct: this protects against double punishment for the same wrong.
