Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Hitesh Umeshbhai Mashru v. State of Gujarat

Criminal Appeal · 2025 INSC 246Decided 18 Feb 2025
Crl.A. No.-000812-000812 - 2025 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 12437/2024)
Justice Bela M. Trivedi · Justice Prasanna B. Varale

Background

The appellant was booked in an FIR alleging offences of cheating a woman by inducement of marriage and rape on a false promise of marriage (Sections 493 and 376(2)(n) IPC), after his marriage to the complainant, the third marriage for both parties, did not proceed as she expected. The Gujarat High Court rejected his application for successive anticipatory bail. He had earlier been granted protection from arrest by the Supreme Court and had cooperated with the investigation in the interim, and by the time of this appeal the investigation was complete and a chargesheet had already been filed.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the underlying allegations, took into account that the appellant had already cooperated with the investigation under the Court's earlier protective order and that the chargesheet had since been filed. On this basis, it allowed the appeal and directed that if the appellant is arrested in connection with this FIR, he must be released on bail on terms to be fixed by the trial court, while making clear the State remains free to seek cancellation of that bail if any conditions are later violated.

Lesson Learnt

Cooperation with an investigation under court-ordered protection, combined with completion of the investigation and filing of a chargesheet, can support a grant of anticipatory bail even after a High Court has refused it, though such relief comes with conditions and can be withdrawn if breached, and it carries no finding on the truth of the underlying allegations.

Hitesh Umeshbhai Mashru v. State of Gujarat – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware