Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Under India's Stamp Act, any commercial document ("instrument") that has not paid the required stamp duty cannot be admitted as evidence or "acted upon" until the duty (plus penalty) is paid. Many commercial contracts contain an arbitration clause, and a running controversy had built up over years of conflicting Supreme Court decisions as to whether a company or person could still send a dispute to arbitration if the underlying contract had not been properly stamped, or whether the arbitration clause itself was legally non-existent until the stamp duty was paid. A five-judge Constitution Bench in an earlier 2023 decision ("NN Global 2") had ruled, by a 3:2 majority, that an unstamped arbitration agreement is void and cannot be acted upon at all. A curative petition (the rarest and final form of Indian Supreme Court review, used only to correct a serious miscarriage of justice) was then filed asking a larger bench to revisit that ruling.
A seven-judge Bench overruled the earlier "NN Global 2" decision (along with two older precedents, SMS Tea Estates and Garware Wall Ropes, on this point). It held that failing to stamp, or under-stamping, a contract makes that document merely "inadmissible" in evidence, not void or non-existent, and that this is a curable defect fixable simply by paying the duty plus penalty later. It ruled that when a court is asked under the Arbitration Act to appoint an arbitrator or refer parties to arbitration, it should only check whether an arbitration agreement "prima facie exists". It should not get bogged down examining or resolving stamping objections at that stage. Any dispute about whether the document was properly stamped should instead be examined by the arbitral tribunal itself once appointed, consistent with the arbitration law's overall design of minimizing court interference and letting arbitral tribunals rule on their own jurisdiction. Justice Khanna's separate opinion agreed with this conclusion but added his own detailed reasoning on how Sections 33, 35, and 36 of the Stamp Act should be read.
A technical revenue-collection defect (like unpaid stamp duty) in a business contract does not kill an arbitration clause inside it: the clause remains valid and can send the dispute to arbitration, with the stamping issue simply deferred to be sorted out (and cured, if needed) by the arbitrator later, rather than blocking access to arbitration altogether.
