Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Company & Insolvency LawSupreme Court of India

Indian Overseas Bank vs. M/s RCM Infrastructure Ltd.

Civil AppealDecided 18 May 2022
Civil Appeal No. 4750 of 2021
L. Nageswara Rao · B.R. Gavai

Background

Indian Overseas Bank, after the Corporate Debtor's loan became a non-performing asset, initiated SARFAESI proceedings, took symbolic possession of two mortgaged properties, and conducted an e-auction where bidders paid 25% upfront and were later granted extra time for the balance 75%. Before the balance was paid, the Corporate Debtor's own promoter filed a Section 10 insolvency petition, which the NCLT admitted on 3 January 2019, triggering a moratorium. The Bank still accepted the remaining 75% payment on 8 March 2019 (after the moratorium began) and issued the sale certificate. The Corporate Debtor's promoter got the NCLT to set aside the sale as violating the moratorium, and the NCLAT upheld this, leading the Bank to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that under the statutory scheme of the SARFAESI Rules, a sale is complete only when the full payment is made and the sale certificate is issued: here that happened on 8 March 2019, after the moratorium under Section 14(1)(c) of the IBC had already come into force on 3 January 2019. Since Section 14(1)(c) bars any action to foreclose, recover, or enforce a security interest (including under SARFAESI) once CIRP begins, and Section 238 gives the IBC overriding effect over inconsistent laws, the Bank could not lawfully complete the sale after the moratorium started. The Court also rejected the Bank's argument that the insolvency petition was filed with mala fide intent to stall the SARFAESI sale, finding no such case made out. The concurrent findings of the NCLT and NCLAT were upheld and the appeal was dismissed.

Lesson Learnt

Once insolvency proceedings are admitted and a moratorium is declared under the IBC, all recovery actions against the corporate debtor's assets, including a SARFAESI sale that has not yet been completed by full payment and issuance of a sale certificate, are frozen, and the IBC's overriding provisions will prevail over banking recovery laws.

Indian Overseas Bank vs. M/s RCM Infrastructure Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware