Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Indra Deo Tiwari vs State of U.P. & Ors.

Not availableDecided 4 May 2022
Not available
Uday Umesh Lalit · S. Ravindra Bhat

Background

A complainant, Indra Deo Tiwari, had challenged an acquittal recorded by the Trial Court in the case. The High Court, after considering the material on record, affirmed the acquittal. Tiwari's Special Leave Petition against the High Court's decision was subsequently dismissed by the Supreme Court after hearing both sides. He then filed a Review Petition seeking reconsideration of that dismissal, along with an application for oral hearing.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court first rejected the application for oral hearing in the review petition. On examining the grounds raised in the Review Petition itself, the Court found no "error apparent on the face of the record" (the well-established, narrow standard required to succeed in a review) that would justify interfering with its earlier order dismissing the Special Leave Petition. Consequently, the Review Petition was dismissed.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition before the Supreme Court is not a second appeal and succeeds only if there is an error apparent on the face of the record; merely being dissatisfied with the outcome, or reiterating the same arguments already considered, is not sufficient ground for review.

Indra Deo Tiwari vs State of U.P. & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware