Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

ITD Cementation India Limited vs. Baya Weaver Ltd and Anr.

Enforcement Petition (Commercial Arbitration) · CNR No. DLHC010986582024Decided 21 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 287/2024CNR: DLHC010986582024
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

The decree-holder sought to enforce an arbitral award against the judgment-debtors, but similar to Case No. 151 above, the award required further compliance with stamp duty requirements under the Indian Stamp Act, consistent with a recent judgment on the subject (M/s URC Construction v. Airports Authority of India).

Decision Breakdown

The decree-holder's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file it afresh once the requisite stamp duty was satisfied. The Court granted this and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Lesson Learnt

Parties seeking to enforce arbitral awards in Delhi courts should ensure stamp duty compliance up front, as courts are increasingly requiring this before proceeding with enforcement, to avoid delay through withdrawal-and-refiling.

ITD Cementation India Limited vs. Baya Weaver Ltd and Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware