Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Haseen, a seven-year-old boy from village Akbarpur (Uttarakhand), went missing on 8 October 1999 and his partly-buried body was found two days later in a sugarcane field in a neighbouring village. No FIR was registered until 21 November 1999, some six weeks later, and only after the boy's father obtained a magistrate's order under Section 156(3) CrPC. The prosecution's case rested on relatives of the father who said they had seen the boy on 8 October being led by the hand into the house of Husn Jahan (the third accused), and early the next morning standing with her brothers Jabir and Jakir near the field where the body was later found. The trial court convicted all three of murder, kidnapping and destroying evidence (Sections 302, 364 and 201 IPC), sentencing them to life imprisonment, and the Uttarakhand High Court affirmed.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the convictions and ordered the accused released. It found the "last seen" witnesses deeply unreliable: they were all close relatives of the father, they were present at the inquest yet said nothing about seeing the boy with the accused, one witness admitted in cross-examination that he never left his house on the morning he claimed to have seen the boy in another village, and another said he heard the child cry out but did not even look back: conduct the Court called unnatural. Their police statements were recorded two months late and the accused had a documented history of enmity with the witnesses' family, giving a motive to implicate them falsely. Applying the "five golden principles" for circumstantial evidence from Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, the Court reiterated that "last seen together" alone cannot found a conviction unless the time gap between the last sighting and the death is so small that no one else could have committed the crime; here the post-mortem could not fix the time of death and there was no other evidence, oral or material, linking the accused to the killing. Suspicion, however grave, cannot substitute for legal proof.
Merely being the last person seen with a victim is not enough to convict someone of murder. The prosecution must prove a complete chain of circumstances that rules out every other explanation. Unexplained delay in lodging an FIR and witnesses who are close relatives with a known grudge seriously weaken a criminal case.
