Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Electricity & Energy LawSupreme Court of India

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. vs. Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. & Anr.

Not available · 2024 INSC 213Decided 18 Mar 2024
Not available
Justice Aniruddha Bose · Justice Sanjay Kumar

Background

Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (APRL) supplied electricity to Rajasthan's distribution companies ("Rajasthan Discoms") under a 2010 Power Purchase Agreement that primarily contemplated domestic coal as fuel, with imported coal as a backup. When domestic coal linkage proved insufficient, APRL had to rely on costlier imported coal from Indonesia and sought compensation, a dispute that was finally decided by a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in 2020 (with the Discoms' review petitions later dismissed). APRL then filed a miscellaneous application seeking a direction for payment of Rs. 1,376.35 crore towards Late Payment Surcharge (LPS), relying partly on observations made in earlier contempt proceedings.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that a miscellaneous application filed in connection with appeals that had already been finally and conclusively decided was not the appropriate legal vehicle to raise a fresh substantive claim for LPS payment, especially since APRL itself had never filed a review petition against the original 2020 judgment. The Court noted that an earlier contempt bench had also declined to address the LPS issue since it fell outside the scope of the contempt proceedings, and clarified that prima facie observations made at an interim stage of the present proceedings did not amount to a finding that the application was maintainable. It dismissed the application as not maintainable and imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on APRL for repeatedly listing the matter.

Lesson Learnt

Once a set of appeals has been finally and conclusively decided by the courts, a party cannot use a miscellaneous application to reopen or add fresh substantive claims: the proper remedy (such as a review petition) must be pursued within the appropriate procedural framework and timeline.

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. vs. Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware