Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreAn organisation named Janshruti (People's Voice) filed a writ petition asking the Supreme Court to frame gender-neutral guidelines for domestic violence and harassment complaints, and to declare Section 498A IPC (dealing with cruelty against a married woman by her husband or his relatives, now Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) unconstitutional, citing concerns about its misuse.
The Court declined to entertain the petition or grant any relief. It held that courts only interfere with legislative policy in narrow situations (where a law lacks any reasonable basis, is driven by bad faith, has no rational connection to its purpose, or violates fundamental rights) and none of these applied here. The Court traced Section 498A's history to the 1983 amendment addressing the serious, entrenched problem of dowry-related cruelty against women, and held that occasional misuse of a provision is not, by itself, a ground to strike it down or dilute it; genuine misuse claims must be examined case-by-case by the appropriate court, not decided in the abstract under writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed.
The Supreme Court will not strike down a protective criminal law provision just because it can sometimes be misused: allegations of misuse must be raised and proven in the specific criminal case itself, not used as a basis to challenge the law's validity in the abstract.
