Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Land at village Jharli, District Jhajjar, Haryana was acquired for the Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant, with the Land Acquisition Collector awarding Rs. 16,00,000/- per acre and a Reference Court later enhancing it to Rs. 17,64,350/- per acre. On cross-appeals, the Punjab and Haryana High Court reduced the compensation back down to Rs. 16,00,000/- per acre, prompting the landowners to appeal to the Supreme Court. The landowners pointed out that land just across the road (Bahu Road) (acquired around the same time for the Arawali Power Project, including land from the same survey number in one instance) had earlier been awarded a much higher Rs. 25,00,000/- per acre by the Supreme Court itself.
The Supreme Court held that the lands acquired for the two projects were similarly situated (same village, directly across from each other, with only a short time gap between the Section 4 notifications), so it would be unjust for landowners on one side of the road to receive vastly less compensation than those on the other side for effectively comparable land. It rejected the argument that the earlier Rs. 25,00,000/- figure was strictly a one-off "not to be treated as precedent" ruling, clarifying that phrase applied narrowly to the Court's use of post-notification sale deeds, not to the comparability of the land itself. Balancing the evidence, the Court fixed just compensation at Rs. 22,00,000/- per acre for the landowners in this batch, along with statutory benefits including interest, except that landowners in a specific set of appeals (arising from RFA Nos. 4322/2016, 4682/2016, 804/2017 and 805/2017) were denied interest for their delay in filing/refiling before the High Court, per an earlier condition imposed by the High Court itself.
In land acquisition compensation disputes, courts look at whether neighbouring or similarly situated land parcels received markedly different compensation and will correct such disparities to ensure landowners get just and equitable compensation for comparable land, even where an earlier ruling was framed as case-specific.
