Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

Karnataka Industrial Corporation vs Sri Lankappa and Ors.

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 29 Mar 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No. 338 of 2022

Background

The petitioner's Civil Appeal No. 7545 of 2021 had earlier been decided by the Supreme Court through a detailed, reasoned judgment. Dissatisfied with the outcome, the petitioner sought a review of that judgment and also asked for an oral hearing on the review petition.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first rejected the request for an oral hearing. On examining the grounds raised in the review petition, it found that they did not disclose any "error apparent on the face of the record": the limited standard needed to reopen a final, reasoned judgment. The Court noted the original appeal had already been decided after considering rival submissions in a reasoned order, and dismissed the review petition.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition cannot be used to re-argue a case that has already been fully considered and reasoned out. It succeeds only where there is a clear, self-evident mistake on the face of the record, and a party's mere disagreement with the outcome does not meet that bar.

Karnataka Industrial Corporation vs Sri Lankappa and Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware