LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors.

Civil Appeal · 2023 INSC 112Decided 9 Feb 2023
Civil Appeal No. 3893 of 2013
Ajay Rastogi · C.T. Ravikumar · Bela M. Trivedi

Background

Karnavati Veneers, a wood-veneer manufacturer in Sabarkantha, Gujarat, held a Standard Fire and Special Perils policy with New India Assurance since 2001, renewed for Rs 1.2 crore cover from 7 October 2006. The factory had been sealed by the Forest Department in July 2006 and its power disconnected in August 2006, so no manufacturing was going on when a devastating fire broke out on 20 October 2006 (Diwali day), just 13 days into the renewed policy. The insurer's own surveyor inspected the site and assessed the loss at Rs 21,76,524, but the insurer repudiated the claim in September 2007, citing condition 6(b) of the policy: that the insured had failed to produce documents the surveyor asked for. The Gujarat State Consumer Commission and then the National Consumer Commission both upheld the repudiation, also voicing suspicion about a "Diwali fire" in a closed factory on the edge of a village.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. It noted that the insurer had not disputed its own surveyor's assessment of Rs 21,76,524 and had never rejected the claim on grounds of suspicion: the surveyor's report recorded no such suspicion, so the consumer commissions' doubts had no factual foundation. Condition 6(b) exists only to enable assessment of the loss; whatever documents the insured had were given to the surveyor, who made a physical inspection and completed his assessment. Once the loss was assessed and not disputed, invoking clause 6(b) to reject the claim outright was "unfair and not legally sustainable". The National Commission's order was set aside and the insurer was directed to pay Rs 21,76,524 with 8% interest per year from the date of the surveyor's report (1 June 2007) until payment, within two months.

Lesson Learnt

An insurer cannot use a "produce documents" clause as a pretext to reject a claim once its own surveyor has inspected the loss and put a figure on it: such clauses are meant to help assess the claim, not to defeat it. Policyholders who have cooperated with the surveyor are entitled to at least the surveyor-assessed amount, with interest for the delay.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware