Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Consumer RightsSupreme Court of India

Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited

Not available · 2024 INSC 542Decided 22 Jul 2024
Not available
Justice C.T. Ravikumar · Justice Sanjay Kumar

Background

Forty-six flat buyers had booked apartments in a Bangalore residential project called "Fiesta Homes by SJR Prime." Under their construction agreements, possession was due by March 2014 (with a grace period), but the builder delayed handing over the flats by roughly four years, and the buyers also complained of construction deficiencies. They approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) seeking compensation for the delay along with refunds of car-parking fees, legal fees, and other charges.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court modified the NCDRC's compensation formula, holding that the buyers were entitled to interest at 6% per annum on their payments, calculated from the contractually due possession date until the date possession was actually offered, rather than being limited to the lower contractual penalty rate of Rs. 2 per square foot per month, following the approach it had previously adopted in a similar case. However, the Court declined to interfere with the NCDRC's rejection of the buyers' claims for refund of car-parking and legal fees, since those claims were not backed by adequate evidence. The appeal was thus allowed only in part.

Lesson Learnt

When a builder unreasonably delays handing over possession, buyers can secure court-ordered interest-based compensation calculated from the due date rather than being limited to a low penalty rate written into the contract, but any additional refund claims still need to be proven with proper evidence.

Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware