Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
An elderly, illiterate, childless woman named Hardei died in 1991, owning land that both her nephew Keshav (her sister's son, who lived with and cared for her) and Gian Chand (her brother's son) claimed rights to. Gian Chand and another relative sued in 1991 claiming Hardei had gifted them the land via a 1985 deed, while Keshav argued he had long been a tenant in occupation and that Hardei herself had denied executing any gift deed before revenue authorities in 1989. The trial court and first appellate court both dismissed the gift-deed claim as fabricated after weighing the evidence, but the High Court's second appeal reversed those concurrent findings, reasoning that a registered gift deed carries a presumption of validity and reinstating the plaintiffs' claim.
The Supreme Court restored the trial court and first appellate court's findings, holding that the High Court had wrongly focused only on whether the gift deed's registration formalities were satisfied, while ignoring the deeper factual question of whether Hardei had voluntarily and knowingly executed it at all. It highlighted strong contrary evidence: Hardei had lived with and depended on Keshav who cared for her, she had explicitly denied the gift deed's execution before revenue authorities years before her death, the deed sat unused for years without any mutation application, and there was no plausible reason she would have given away her only asset to relatives she did not live with. The Court reiterated that when an elderly, illiterate, or infirm person's document is challenged, the person benefiting from it bears the burden of proving it was executed with full understanding and free will, a burden the plaintiffs failed to meet, and that a second appeal cannot lightly overturn concurrent factual findings of two lower courts unless they are perverse, which was not the case here.
A registered gift deed is not automatically valid just because it is properly signed and registered. When the person who supposedly gave the property is elderly, illiterate, or vulnerable, courts require clear proof that the gift was made knowingly and voluntarily, and prior denials of the transaction by that person carry significant weight.
