Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The accused had been acquitted of the 1988 murder of one Qavi. The victim's brother, dissatisfied with the acquittal, filed a criminal revision before the Bombay High Court; the High Court first set aside the acquittal without giving the accused a hearing, but the Supreme Court sent the matter back because Section 401(2) CrPC bars a revisional court from acting to an accused's prejudice without a hearing. On remand, the High Court again remitted the case to the trial court for reconsideration, prompting the accused to appeal to the Supreme Court against this second remand order.
The Supreme Court first clarified that a procedural question about whether such revisions must go before a single judge or a division bench had become academic, since a 2009 amendment gave victims a distinct statutory right of appeal under Section 372 CrPC rather than relying on the revisional route at all. On reappreciating the evidence itself, the Court found the prosecution's case unconvincing: the eyewitness testimonies were unreliable and inconsistent with medical evidence about whether the victim was even conscious enough to identify his attackers, the dying declaration had not been believed by any court below, the crime scene showed no signs consistent with the alleged brutal attack, and the only real evidence, a blood-stained weapon recovered under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, could not, by itself, prove guilt without other evidence forming a complete chain excluding innocence. Reaffirming the principle that an acquittal fortifies the presumption of innocence and should not be overturned merely because another view is possible, the Court held this was not a fit case to convert the revision into an appeal, allowed the accused's appeal, and restored the trial court's order of acquittal, directing their release if not wanted in any other case.
A trial court's acquittal carries a reinforced presumption of innocence, and appellate or revisional courts cannot overturn it based on suspicion, an unproven dying declaration, or a single piece of forensic evidence (like a recovered weapon). The prosecution must forge a complete chain of evidence that excludes any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
