Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThe appellant's cousin had allegedly been raped by a man named "V," which led to friction between the two families over whether V should marry the cousin. During an attempted resolution that turned into a scuffle between the families, the appellant picked up an axe from a nearby house and struck the neck of "S," V's younger brother, who had merely intervened to stop the fight. S died from the injury. The trial court convicted the appellant of culpable homicide not amounting to murder (a lesser offence than murder) and sentenced him to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment; the High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to 8 years. The appellant sought a further reduction, arguing he was young (about 20) and had acted without premeditation in the heat of the moment.
The Supreme Court noted neither the State nor the complainant had appealed the conviction itself, so only the sentence was at issue. The Court found that S, an innocent bystander merely trying to make peace, bore no responsibility for the underlying dispute, and that the appellant had the requisite knowledge that striking someone's neck with an axe was likely to cause death. Weighing established sentencing principles (that punishment must be proportionate, not excessively lenient or harsh, and must reflect society's expectations of justice) the Court held that the High Court had already been reasonably lenient in reducing the sentence to 8 years, and declined to reduce it further. The appeal was dismissed, though the Court noted the appellant remains free to seek premature release later under Karnataka's ordinary remission policy if he becomes eligible.
Being young or emotionally provoked by a family grievance does not automatically entitle a person to a reduced sentence for killing someone, especially when the person killed was an uninvolved bystander trying to prevent violence; sentencing courts must balance the accused's circumstances against the harm caused and society's interest in proportionate justice.
