Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Constitutional LawSupreme Court of India

Lahra Bai Tamre and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh

Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 840Decided 12 Aug 2026
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 728 of 2026
Justice Vikram Nath · Justice Sandeep Mehta

Background

Shravan Suryavanshi died in police custody in January 2024, days after being arrested over a minor liquor-possession offence carrying a maximum three-year sentence; a post-mortem found multiple injuries including a head injury, contradicting the jail's own medical report which had recorded the cause of death as unrelated to any assault. His widow and daughters sought a fair investigation and compensation from the Chhattisgarh High Court, which found custodial violence had occurred but awarded only Rs. 1 lakh compensation and issued no direction to investigate or prosecute anyone. The family then approached the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court found that senior Chhattisgarh police and prison officials had given false and evasive explanations for never registering an FIR or investigating the death, despite a judicial inquiry report on the custodial death having been available all along; the Court called the officials' conduct "sacrilegious" and a "cover-up." It ordered the CBI to immediately register a criminal case and investigate the custodial death, including examining why state officials failed to act on the inquiry report, and directed the State to pay Rs. 25 lakh in interim compensation to the family within four weeks, with final compensation to be decided later.

Lesson Learnt

Courts will not accept a state's inaction or evasive explanations when there is documented evidence of a custodial death, and families of custodial death victims can secure both an independent CBI investigation and substantial interim compensation even where local authorities and lower courts have failed to act.

Lahra Bai Tamre and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware