Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

LiuGong India Pvt Ltd vs. Crosslite Infra Pvt Ltd and Ors

Original Miscellaneous Petition (Interim, Commercial) · 2026:DHC:8227Decided 23 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 181/2026CNR: DLHC010179292026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

LiuGong India, a seller of heavy machinery, had sued Crosslite Infra under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, alleging that Crosslite had failed to pay for machines supplied under a sale agreement and seeking to restrain Crosslite from disposing of or encumbering that machinery pending arbitration. In April 2026, the Court had already granted interim protection restraining any transfer of the machines.

Decision Breakdown

Noting that the petitioner had been enjoying interim protection since April 2026 without initiating arbitration, the Court held that such interim relief could not continue indefinitely. It directed LiuGong to take steps to constitute the Arbitral Tribunal within three weeks, after which the interim petition would be treated as an application before the arbitrator. The existing interim protection would continue only until the arbitrator considered the matter, and would automatically lapse if arbitration was not commenced within the three-week window.

Lesson Learnt

A party that obtains urgent interim protection from a court pending arbitration must promptly get the arbitration itself underway: courts will not let a party sit on court-granted interim relief indefinitely without actually pursuing the arbitration for which that relief was meant to be a stop-gap.

LiuGong India Pvt Ltd vs. Crosslite Infra Pvt Ltd and Ors – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware