Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In 1984, a young woman who went to the accused's house to give tuition to his nieces was allegedly lured upstairs, locked in a room, and raped after her mouth was gagged with cloth; she was threatened with death if she raised an alarm, but eventually raised an outcry that drew help. A case was registered and, after trial, the accused was convicted under Sections 376 and 323 IPC and sentenced to 5 years' rigorous imprisonment; the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) upheld the conviction in 2010, acquitting him only of a separate threat-related charge. He appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing the witnesses were interested parties, medical evidence showed no injuries, there was delay in filing the FIR, and the complainant's mother had a "doubtful character."
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction, holding the prosecutrix's testimony was consistent, unshaken even under cross-examination, and inspired confidence, and reaffirmed the settled principle (citing State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat) that a rape conviction can rest on the sole, reliable testimony of the victim without independent corroboration. It held that the absence of injuries on private parts is not automatically fatal to a rape case, since this depends on the specific facts, and that unproven, irrelevant attacks on the character of the victim's mother have no bearing on whether the accused committed the offence. The delay in lodging the FIR was found to be adequately explained by the threats made against the victim's family. Given the case was decades old (incident in 1984, High Court judgment in 2010), the Court additionally directed the authorities to consider the convict for remission under applicable state policy within four weeks.
Courts can and do convict solely on a rape survivor's credible testimony, corroborating injuries or witnesses are not mandatory, and attempts to discredit a victim by attacking the character of her family members, rather than addressing the actual evidence of the offence, carry no legal weight.
