Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Two neighbouring families, the "Gala's" and the "Ramani's," disputed the right to use a 20-foot road that ran through land owned by the Ramani's, which the Gala's claimed was their only access to their own adjoining land. The Gala's had filed a suit seeking a declaration of easementary rights and an injunction, while the Ramani's filed a separate suit seeking a declaration that the Gala's had no such right and an order restraining them from using the road. The trial court initially ruled for the Gala's, but the first appellate court reversed this and the Bombay High Court, in second appeal, upheld the reversal, dismissing the Gala's claim and decreeing the Ramani's suit against them.
The Supreme Court held that to acquire an easement by "prescription" under Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, a party must plead and prove peaceable, uninterrupted use of the land for over 20 years: the Gala's pleadings only vaguely claimed use for "last many years," which was legally insufficient, and neither they nor their predecessor ever testified to substantiate any such long use. Their claim to an "easement of necessity" also failed because the lower courts had found an alternative (though longer) route existed to their land, which rules out necessity. Their reliance on a 1994 sale deed to claim a transferred easement right also failed since only a photocopy (not the original) was produced, and there was no proof their sellers ever actually held any such right to pass on. The Court also clarified that a Power-of-Attorney holder can only testify to facts within his personal knowledge, and cannot substitute for the actual party's testimony on facts predating his involvement. Finding no error in the High Court's approach, the Supreme Court dismissed the Gala's appeals.
Claiming a right of way over someone else's land requires actual proof: specific pleading and evidence of at least 20 years of continuous, peaceable use, an original (not photocopied) document if relying on a deed, and testimony from someone with direct personal knowledge, not just a general statement or a Power-of-Attorney holder's second-hand account.
