Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Consumer RightsDelhi High Court

Manju Devi & Anr. vs. Union of India

First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:7712Decided 9 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
FAO 24/2025CNR: DLHC010043672025
Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri

Background

A young man travelling on a train from New Delhi to Faridabad fell off after feeling nauseous and losing his balance near the door; he later died from his injuries. His mother's compensation claim was rejected by the Railway Claims Tribunal because no train journey ticket was found on his body, only a valid platform ticket recovered during the search.

Decision Breakdown

The High Court reversed the Tribunal, holding that the mere absence of a journey ticket does not automatically disqualify a victim from being treated as a genuine ("bona fide") passenger, per Supreme Court precedent. Here, the platform ticket was valid at the exact time of the incident, and the mother's sworn statement that her son had bought a journey ticket (lost in the accident) was unrebutted by the Railways. The Court also noted the law explicitly defines "passenger" to include someone with a valid platform ticket who becomes a victim of a railway accident. The case was sent back to the Tribunal to calculate the compensation amount.

Lesson Learnt

If a loved one dies in a railway accident and their train ticket cannot be found (because it was lost in the accident itself), a sworn affidavit explaining this, combined with other supporting evidence like a valid platform ticket, can still succeed in establishing entitlement to compensation.

Manju Devi & Anr. vs. Union of India – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware