Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant was convicted of kidnapping a seven-and-a-half-year-old physically and mentally challenged girl from in front of her parents' fruit-and-vegetable cart, taking her to a secluded place, raping her, and killing her by inflicting fatal head injuries. The case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence: the victim was last seen with the appellant, the dead body and related articles were recovered based on his disclosures, he could not satisfactorily explain his whereabouts, and forensic/medical evidence matched the prosecution's case. The Trial Court convicted him under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f) and 302 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, and awarded him the death sentence for murder; the Rajasthan High Court, treating the crime as "rarest of rare," confirmed both the conviction and the death sentence. He appealed to the Supreme Court challenging both.
After extensively reviewing the chain of circumstantial evidence (last-seen testimony, recoveries at the appellant's instance, forensic (FSL) reports, and medical evidence) the Court found the chain of circumstances complete and conclusive of guilt, rejecting arguments about investigation lapses, hurried trial, and inadequate legal aid, and upheld the conviction. On sentencing, applying the "rarest of rare" doctrine from Bachan Singh and Machhi Singh, the Court weighed aggravating factors: the extreme brutality of the crime against a disabled child, use of a stolen motorcycle, the appellant's history of prior criminal cases, and critically, his conviction for murdering a fellow jail inmate after this case's conviction: against mitigating factors like his young age (28) and family responsibilities. Finding no realistic probability of reform or rehabilitation given his continued violent conduct even in custody, and declining to order a psychological evaluation report as unwarranted on these facts, the Court held it a case with "no other option" but to confirm the death sentence, and dismissed the appeals.
In death penalty cases, courts weigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances relating to both the crime and the criminal as a whole, including conduct after conviction, and a demonstrated pattern of continuing violent, incorrigible behaviour (even while incarcerated) can be decisive in confirming a death sentence over commutation, because it undermines any realistic possibility of reform.
