Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Constitutional LawSupreme Court of India

Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri

Transfer Petition (Civil)Decided 19 May 2023
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1595 of 2022
Sanjay Kishan Kaul · Ahsanuddin Amanullah

Background

The wife had filed a petition seeking transfer of the husband's divorce petition from the Family Court in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, to Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Alongside this, the wife's father had lodged an FIR against the husband under Section 498A IPC (cruelty) and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the wife had filed a maintenance case under Section 125 CrPC. During Supreme Court mediation, the parties failed to reach a full settlement but both indicated willingness for a mutual consent divorce, with the only real dispute being the amount of permanent alimony: the wife sought Rs. 70 lakh while the husband offered Rs. 25 lakh.

Decision Breakdown

Examining the financial position of both parties (the wife having virtually no income or assets and being dependent on her father, the husband earning about Rs. 87,538 take-home per month with various savings and a car loan), the Court found the marriage had suffered an irretrievable breakdown. Exercising its special power under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice, it granted a decree of mutual consent divorce, quashed the FIR and the maintenance case, and directed that the pending divorce petition stand withdrawn. It fixed permanent alimony at Rs. 35 lakh, payable within six months, and made clear that if the amount was not paid in time, the quashed FIR and maintenance case would automatically stand revived.

Lesson Learnt

The Supreme Court can use its Article 142 power to cut through multiple pending matrimonial proceedings (FIR, maintenance case, divorce petition) at once and grant a clean, comprehensive resolution when both spouses are genuinely willing to part ways, but such relief can be conditioned on compliance (like timely payment of alimony) to ensure fairness to the more financially vulnerable party.

Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware