Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Marayammal & Ors. vs K.S. Venkidusamy & Anr.

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 30 Aug 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No. 1182 of 2018

Background

After losing a civil appeal and then a review petition before the Supreme Court, the petitioners (Marayammal and others) filed a curative petition: the narrowest and final avenue in Indian law to reopen a Supreme Court decision, available only in exceptional circumstances. The Court considered the petition and the underlying case papers without oral arguments, since a request for an oral hearing was itself rejected.

Decision Breakdown

The bench examined the curative petition and the relevant record and applied the settled test from the Constitution Bench decision in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC 388, which permits curative petitions only where there has been a violation of natural justice or a demonstrated case of bias. Finding that the petitioners had not made out any case falling within those narrow parameters, the Court dismissed the curative petition without giving detailed reasons, as is standard practice for curative petitions that fail to meet the threshold.

Lesson Learnt

A curative petition is not a routine "fourth appeal". It succeeds only in the rarest cases involving a genuine breach of natural justice or proven bias, not merely because a litigant disagrees with the outcome of an earlier appeal and review.

Marayammal & Ors. vs K.S. Venkidusamy & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware