Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreSeven men were accused of murdering the appellant's son and were facing trial for offences including murder, criminal conspiracy, and rioting. A Sessions Judge had rejected their bail applications, but the Allahabad High Court later granted them bail in a one-line order that gave no reasons beyond stating it found the case "fit for bail." The father of the deceased, as complainant, appealed to the Supreme Court against the grant of bail, and the State also supported the challenge.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court had committed a jurisdictional error by granting bail without assigning any reasons, even prima facie ones, showing that it had applied its mind to the relevant facts, including the FIR, the antecedents of the accused, and the manner in which the murder was committed. Relying on its own precedents requiring courts to give at least brief reasons while granting or refusing bail, the Court found that neither the settled law nor the material on record had been considered by the High Court. Examining the case itself, the Court held that, prima facie, this was not a fit case for bail given the seriousness of the offence and the accused's antecedents. It therefore set aside the High Court's bail orders, dismissed the bail applications, and directed the accused to surrender, while clarifying that the trial court should decide the actual trial on its merits uninfluenced by these observations.
A bail order, whether granting or refusing bail, must show that the court actually applied its mind to the facts of the case; an unreasoned order, even a brief one, risks being set aside on appeal regardless of the ultimate outcome.
