Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Mendar Singh @ Vijay Singh vs. State of Bihar

Not available · 2024 INSC 969Decided 10 Dec 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Background

The appellant was facing an FIR alleging offences under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, the Arms Act, and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. A High Court single judge granted him bail in December 2022. When the complainant sought modification of that bail order, the judge instead directed an inquiry into whether the appellant had suppressed his criminal antecedents while seeking bail, and, after receiving the inquiry report, recalled the bail order entirely in August 2023, effectively cancelling the appellant's liberty.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that bail already granted can only be cancelled on the ground of subsequent misconduct, such as violating bail conditions or misusing liberty, and that no such allegation had been made against the appellant here. The High Court's own inquiry into the appellant's past antecedents was not, by itself, a valid ground to recall bail once granted. The Court set aside the recall order and restored the original bail order.

Lesson Learnt

Bail cannot be cancelled just because a court later has second thoughts or orders an inquiry into the accused's past: cancellation requires actual proof that the accused breached bail conditions or misused the liberty granted.

Mendar Singh @ Vijay Singh vs. State of Bihar – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware