Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings began against a corporate debtor, Associate Decor Ltd, in October 2018, and the appellant company was eventually declared the successful resolution applicant after its plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) through e-voting in February 2020. The suspended director of the corporate debtor (respondent no. 1) challenged this outcome before the Karnataka High Court in a writ petition, filed roughly three years after the disputed CoC meeting, alleging he was not given adequate notice of that meeting and that this violated principles of natural justice. The High Court ultimately set aside the approved resolution plan on this ground, prompting appeals to the Supreme Court by the successful resolution applicant, the consortium of banks on the CoC, and the Resolution Professional.
The Supreme Court held that the respondent's writ petition to the High Court was filed with an unexplained and substantial delay of almost three years after the event complained of, and that pending proceedings before other forums (including an unrelated company's separate challenge) did not excuse this delay. The Court also noted that the respondent had himself already pursued the same grievance through the IBC's own statutory remedy by filing an application before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT), meaning the High Court should have relegated him to that avenue rather than entertaining a writ petition in parallel. Reiterating that the IBC is a complete code with its own built-in checks, remedies, and appeals, the Court held that the High Court had erred in exercising its extraordinary writ jurisdiction to interdict CIRP proceedings that were already six years old, especially when an alternate statutory remedy was available and had in fact already been invoked. The appeals were allowed, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and the Adjudicating Authority was directed to resume and expeditiously complete the proceedings from the point where they had been interrupted.
Where a specialised law like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provides its own complete set of remedies and appeal mechanisms, courts should generally not use writ jurisdiction to bypass or interrupt that statutory process, especially when the aggrieved party has delayed for years and has already chosen to pursue the very same grievance through the law's own designated forum.
