Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Mohar Singh (Dead) Through LRs. & Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh Collector & Ors.

Civil Appeal · 2023 INSC 1019Decided 7 Nov 2023
Civil Appeal Nos. 7504-7505 of 2023
Surya Kant · Dipankar Datta

Background

The appellants' land in village Khora, Ghaziabad, was acquired in 1988, and after a reference court raised their compensation to Rs.106 per sq. yard, other similarly placed landowners appealed to the High Court and eventually got it raised further (to Rs.130, and then to Rs.150 by the Supreme Court in a related case). The present appellants, however, filed their own appeal nearly 13 years late, citing illiteracy and poverty, and the High Court refused to condone the delay and dismissed their appeal outright.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that in compensation matters, an inordinate delay need not be fatal because the resulting unfairness can instead be balanced by denying the latecomers the statutory interest they would otherwise have earned for the delayed period. It therefore condoned the 13-year delay and granted the appellants parity with their co-villagers at Rs.150 per sq. yard, but denied them statutory interest (including on solatium) for the period between the reference court's award and the actual filing of their appeal, and separately rejected their further claim for an even higher rate paid for a neighboring village's land, since that claim had already been considered and rejected in the connected proceedings.

Lesson Learnt

Courts can excuse very long delays in compensation appeals to ensure equal treatment among similarly situated claimants, but the price of that leniency is forfeiting the interest that would have accrued had the claim been filed on time: vigilance in pursuing legal remedies still carries a real financial reward.

Mohar Singh (Dead) Through LRs. & Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh Collector & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware