Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Mohd. Abdul Samad vs. State of Telangana & Anr

Not available · 2024 INSC 506Decided 10 Jul 2024
Not available
Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna · Justice Augustine George Masih

Background

A husband pronounced triple talaq on his wife in 2017 after she filed a criminal complaint alleging cruelty and dowry harassment against him. The wife sought maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the general, secular maintenance law available to all women) rather than under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, which specifically governs divorced Muslim women. The husband argued that the 1986 Act, being a special law, was the only remedy available to her and that Section 125 CrPC could not be invoked. The Family Court and Telangana High Court both dealt with the interim maintenance amount, and the husband's appeal reached the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that Section 125 CrPC applies to all married and divorced women, including Muslim women, and that the 1986 Act does not exclude or override this secular remedy. It merely provides an additional option. A divorced Muslim woman can choose to seek maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, under the 1986 Act, or invoke both, since the 1986 Act was intended to supplement, not replace, existing protections. The Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the wife's right to maintenance under the general law.

Lesson Learnt

A divorced Muslim woman is not restricted to remedies under Muslim personal law alone. She retains the right to seek maintenance under the general, secular law (Section 125 CrPC) that applies to all women in India, in addition to any personal-law remedy.

Mohd. Abdul Samad vs. State of Telangana & Anr – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware