Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Mohd. Tahir Hussain, a former Aam Aadmi Party councillor turned AIMIM candidate, was in custody since March 2020 in connection with FIR No. 65/2020 for rioting and the murder of Intelligence Bureau official Ankit Sharma during the February 2020 Delhi riots, along with several other pending riot-related cases and one under the PMLA. Having been denied regular bail, he sought interim bail solely to campaign and canvass for the Delhi Assembly Election 2025 from Mustafabad constituency (the Delhi High Court had already allowed him custody parole just to file his nomination, but not to campaign). He challenged the High Court's refusal to extend that relief to campaigning before the Supreme Court.
Justice Pankaj Mithal would have dismissed the petition outright, reasoning that a right to canvass or campaign is not a fundamental, constitutional, or even statutory right; that recognizing "contesting an election" as grounds for interim bail would open a "Pandora's box" given how frequently elections occur in India; and that it would also sit awkwardly against Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, which bars a person in custody from voting. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah disagreed, emphasizing that the petitioner remained a presumed-innocent accused (not a convict), had already secured bail in most of his other cases, and had been in custody a long time. He granted interim bail up to noon on 4 February 2025, subject to strict conditions (no reference to the pending cases or the 2020 riots while campaigning, confinement to the Mustafabad constituency, and surrender of any passport), while also refusing to impose a real-time-location-tracking condition on privacy grounds. Because the two judges could not agree, they directed the Registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice of India for resolution, leaving the final outcome undecided by this particular bench.
The right to contest an election is a statutory right that Indian courts will protect even for an undertrial in custody (through steps like custody parole for nomination formalities), but there is no established right to campaign from jail, and reasonable judges can genuinely disagree on where the balance lies between an accused's presumption of innocence and the risk of using interim bail as a backdoor around continued incarceration.
