Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Indian Overseas Bank took possession of a mortgaged property under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and auctioned it, advertising 54 cents of land on an "as is where is" basis. The appellant bid and paid the full sale consideration for 54 cents, on the express condition that she receive absolute ownership and vacant possession of the whole 54 cents. A subsequent Tehsildar's survey revealed the actual area was only about 34.60/39.60 cents, since the original debtor had already transferred roughly 14.40 cents before the mortgage, yet the Bank still issued the sale certificate and later the sale deed for the full 54 cents while handing over possession of only the smaller actual area. The buyer sued for compensation for the shortfall; the Trial Court decreed in her favour, but the Kerala High Court reversed that decree on the Bank's appeal, leading to this further appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that once the Bank had invited bids for 54 cents, accepted payment calculated for 54 cents, and issued a sale certificate (and later a registered sale deed) for 54 cents, it could not later rely on the "as is where is, as is what is" auction condition to escape liability for the area shortfall, especially since the Bank itself became aware from the Tehsildar's 2007 report that the actual area was less, yet still issued the certificate for the full 54 cents. The Court also invoked Rule 8(5) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, which requires an authorised officer to obtain a proper valuation before fixing the reserve price, and Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act's disclosure obligations on a seller, to hold the Bank responsible for the shortfall. It found the High Court erred in overturning the Trial Court's decree, restored the Trial Court's judgment directing the Bank to pay the decretal amount (with interest) to the buyer, and additionally awarded costs of Rs. 25,000 to be paid within eight weeks.
An "as is where is" clause in a bank auction does not shield the seller from liability where it knowingly issues a sale certificate and deed for a larger area than what it actually conveys: a secured creditor selling property under SARFAESI must accurately verify and disclose the true extent of the asset, and cannot recover full sale consideration for land it never delivers.
