Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawSupreme Court of India

M/S. D. Khosla and Company vs. The Union of India

Not available · 2024 INSC 587Decided 7 Aug 2024
Not available
Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · Justice Pankaj Mithal

Background

In a 1984-85 government contract dispute, an arbitrator awarded the contractor (D. Khosla and Company) a sum with simple interest at 12% per annum for the period before the award and 15% per annum for the period after the award until payment. A court decree was drawn on this basis. After being paid the principal plus interest, the contractor filed an execution petition claiming a shortfall, arguing the post-award 15% interest should be calculated on the principal amount plus the pre-award 12% interest (i.e., interest on interest). Both the executing court and the High Court rejected this claim, holding only simple interest was payable on the principal sum.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that "interest on interest" (compound interest) cannot be awarded unless specifically permitted by the statute or the contract terms. Under the Arbitration Act, 1940, the Code of Civil Procedure, and the Interest Act, 1978, courts and arbitrators may only order interest on the principal sum adjudged, not on previously accrued interest, absent a specific enabling provision. The Court found that the award and decree in this case referred to the same "amount awarded" (the principal compensation) in both interest periods, and neither document indicated that post-award interest should be computed on the principal plus pre-award interest. The Court also distinguished this case from certain arbitration cases under the newer 1996 Act where the word "sum" (as opposed to "principal sum adjudged") has been read more broadly.

Lesson Learnt

When a court or arbitral award grants interest for two separate periods, the second period's interest is ordinarily calculated only on the original principal amount, not on the principal plus the interest already accrued: compound interest can be claimed only if the award, decree, statute, or contract expressly says so.

M/S. D. Khosla and Company vs. The Union of India – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware