Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Godrej Sara Lee makes household insecticides such as "Good Knight" and "Hit" mosquito mats and coils. For the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 the Haryana Assessing Authority taxed these products at the 4% "insecticide" rate, expressly because the Haryana Tax Tribunal had already ruled in 2001 that mosquito repellents containing Allethrin are insecticides. Years later a Revisional Authority reopened both completed assessments on its own motion under Section 34 of the Haryana VAT Act and demanded tax at 10%, treating the goods as unscheduled general items. When the company challenged this in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the High Court refused to hear the writ petition, saying the company should have filed a statutory appeal instead.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court was wrong to throw out the writ petition at the threshold. It explained that the existence of an alternative remedy never makes a writ petition "not maintainable"; it only goes to whether the High Court should choose to "entertain" it, and that is a rule of discretion, not a rule of law. Where the challenge is a pure question of law (here, whether the Revisional Authority had any jurisdiction at all) the High Court ought to decide it rather than send the taxpayer through the appeal ladder. Rather than remit the matter after fourteen years, the Court decided the jurisdiction point itself: the Tribunal's 2001 order on the same classification question had become final and bound the entire State machinery, including the Revisional Authority, and the first proviso to Section 34 expressly bars revision on an issue already settled by an appellate authority. Since the Assessing Authority had simply followed a binding Tribunal ruling, its orders suffered from no "illegality or impropriety" that could justify revision; it was the revisional orders that were patently illegal. Both revisional orders of 2 March 2009 were quashed and the appeal allowed.
A government officer cannot reopen a finished tax assessment merely because they disagree with a higher tribunal's binding ruling: judicial discipline requires lower authorities to follow superior decisions until they are set aside. Separately, a High Court cannot mechanically dismiss a writ petition just because an appeal route exists; where the complaint is that an authority acted wholly without jurisdiction, the writ court should look at the merits.
