Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

M/S. Himalaya Distilleries Limited vs. Urmila Pradhan

Not availableDecided 25 Feb 2022
Not available
Abhay S. Oka

Background

In October 2021, the Supreme Court had earlier ordered that a title suit be transferred from its original venue to the District Court at Siliguri, West Bengal. However, the District Judge at Sikkim reported back that there was, in fact, no District Court at Siliguri, so the earlier transfer order could not be carried out as directed.

Decision Breakdown

With both sides' senior counsel agreeing that a Court of Senior Civil Judge did exist at Siliguri and could try the matter, the Supreme Court modified its earlier order accordingly, directing that the suit instead be transferred to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Siliguri, West Bengal, and disposed of the miscellaneous application on that basis.

Lesson Learnt

Even a Supreme Court transfer order can be practically modified when the destination court named turns out not to exist, showing that courts remain flexible to correct purely administrative or logistical impossibilities in their own earlier orders.

M/S. Himalaya Distilleries Limited vs. Urmila Pradhan – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware