Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreJ.K. Cement Limited had filed a Special Leave Petition against the State of Rajasthan and others. This petition was listed together with a batch of connected matters raising the same point of law, led by Civil Appeal No. 434 of 2016 (State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs. Gotan Lime Stone Khanji Udyog Private Limited), a mining-lease dispute, which the same Bench decided by a full reasoned judgment on the very same day, 20 January 2016.
Rather than hearing or deciding J.K. Cement's petition independently, the Bench recorded that, in view of the judgment just delivered the same day in the connected Civil Appeal No. 434 of 2016, "no further order is necessary in this petition," and the petition stood disposed of accordingly. This is a genuine final disposal of J.K. Cement's own case, the petition is over, not merely adjourned or referred elsewhere, but the order itself states no independent facts or reasoning specific to J.K. Cement; the operative legal analysis lies entirely in the companion Gotan Lime Stone judgment, decided separately.
When several petitioners raise an identical legal question, Indian courts frequently decide one "lead" case with full reasoning and then finally dispose of every tagged or connected petition by simply applying that outcome: such a short "stands disposed of accordingly" order is still a complete, final decision on that petitioner's own case, even though it borrows its reasoning from elsewhere.
