Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, in an earlier ruling in the same case (N.N. Global-2, 2021), had held that an arbitration clause is a separate agreement from the underlying contract and survives even if the main contract is unstamped, since stamp deficiency is a curable defect that does not affect the existence of the arbitration agreement. Because this conflicted with earlier judgments (SMS Tea Estates and Garware Wall Ropes) which had held that an unstamped instrument containing an arbitration clause cannot be acted upon until stamp duty is paid, the question of correctness of the 2021 ruling was referred to a Constitution Bench. The core issue: at the stage a court appoints an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, must it first ensure the underlying contract is properly stamped under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899?
By a 3:2 majority, the Court held that an arbitration agreement contained in an unstamped or insufficiently stamped commercial contract is not a validly enforceable contract in law until the underlying instrument is duly stamped, because Section 35 of the Stamp Act bars an unstamped instrument from being "acted upon" for any purpose, including invoking the arbitration clause. It held that N.N. Global-2 (2021) was wrongly decided in overruling SMS Tea Estates and Garware, and restored the position that a court exercising power under Section 11 to appoint an arbitrator is duty-bound to first impound the unstamped instrument under Section 33 of the Stamp Act and ensure duty and penalty are paid before proceeding. The doctrine of separability of the arbitration clause from the main contract, the majority held, does not exempt the arbitration clause from this requirement where the whole instrument (including the clause) attracts stamp duty. Rastogi, J. and Roy, J. dissented, holding that stamp deficiency is a curable defect that should not stall referral to arbitration at the threshold Section 11 stage and can be examined later by the arbitral tribunal itself.
Parties executing commercial contracts with arbitration clauses must ensure the contract is properly stamped: an unstamped agreement can hold up the appointment of an arbitrator entirely, as the court must first send it for stamping/impounding before it can even consider the arbitration request. (Note: this position was later revisited by a seven-judge bench in December 2023 in "In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899," which held unstamped agreements are not rendered void or unenforceable and stamp objections can be resolved by the arbitral tribunal, but as of this April 2023 judgment, the law stood as summarized above.)
