Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant, a supplier, had an unpaid claim against a paper mill that was later declared a "sick" (financially distressed) company and taken over under a special 1990 Assam state law. A government-appointed "Commissioner of Payments" awarded the principal amount but refused to pay interest, and after years of litigation over the interest claim, the Commissioner eventually found no further amount payable. The appellant filed an appeal against that decision more than three years later. The dispute reached the Supreme Court on the narrow legal question of whether such an appeal, since the special Assam law itself set no time limit, was nonetheless bound by the 30/90-day limitation period found in Article 116 of the general Limitation Act (which applies to appeals "under the Code" of Civil Procedure).
The Court held that the Commissioner of Payments under the special Assam law was not a "Court" governed by the Code of Civil Procedure. The law only borrowed a few specific CPC-style powers (like summoning witnesses) for limited purposes, and deliberately left the appeal provision itself without any reference to the Code's procedure. Applying the principle that a legislature's silence on a limitation period should not be filled in by judges inventing one, the Court held that Article 116 of the Limitation Act simply did not apply here. Instead, such an appeal must be filed within a "reasonable time," to be assessed case-by-case based on the conduct of the parties, the length of delay, and any prejudice caused, and on the facts (including that the appellant had pursued other remedies like a contempt petition in the interim), the roughly three-and-a-half-year delay was not unreasonable. The appeal was therefore allowed and the matter sent back to the District Judge to be decided on merits.
Where a special law creates its own appellate remedy but is silent on the time limit, courts will not automatically import the general Limitation Act's rigid deadlines, instead, the "reasonable time" standard applies, assessed on the specific facts, so a party is not automatically shut out merely because a general limitation period (meant for ordinary civil court appeals) has technically expired.
