Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThe appellant ran a chit fund (a rotating savings scheme) from 1978 to 1990 in which the respondents were subscribers. When the respondents defaulted on 12 monthly installments, the chit foreman (organizer) sued for recovery, first for the defaulted installments and then separately for all future subscriptions that would otherwise fall due under the chit agreement. The trial court decreed both suits in the foreman's favour, but the Kerala High Court later held that the foreman could not recover future (not-yet-due) subscriptions in one lump sum, prompting this appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court examined the legal nature of the relationship between a chit fund subscriber and its foreman, holding that a subscriber's obligation to pay future installments is a present contractual debt created at the time of subscription, not a mere promise to be fulfilled only when each installment falls due. It reasoned that allowing the foreman to recover the full outstanding balance in one go upon a subscriber's default was necessary to protect the interests of other subscribers and keep the chit fund scheme financially workable, and that such a provision was not a penalty. The Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgment and restored the trial court's decrees allowing lump-sum recovery of future subscriptions.
When you join a chit fund (a common rotating-savings arrangement), your obligation to pay all future installments becomes a binding debt from the day you join: if you default, the organizer can legally demand the entire remaining amount at once rather than waiting for each installment to separately fall due.
