Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

M/S Paul Rubber Industries Private Limited vs. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr.

Not available · 2023 INSC 854Decided 25 Sept 2023
Not available
Aniruddha Bose · Vikram Nath

Background

A landlady in Kolkata let out roughly 16 cottahs of land to a company, Paul Rubber Industries, under a 2003 "Tenancy Agreement" for five years, but the agreement was never registered. After the five years lapsed and rent went unpaid, the landlady issued a 15-day notice to vacate and, when the tenant did not leave, sued for possession. The tenant argued the notice should have been for six months instead of 15 days, claiming the property was leased for "manufacturing purposes" (which would trigger a longer notice period under the Transfer of Property Act), relying on the terms of the unregistered lease deed itself to prove this.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that because the lease was for a fixed five-year term, Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act made registration compulsory, and an unregistered document of this kind cannot be used as evidence of the lease's terms or duration under Section 49 of the Registration Act, not even to prove the purpose of the tenancy, since that was the very issue in dispute (not a "collateral" matter, where an unregistered deed could otherwise be looked at). The tenant bore the burden of independently proving the property was used for manufacturing, and merely asserting it or pointing to a "factory shed/godown" description was insufficient: actual evidence of a manufacturing process was needed and was not produced. Since the tenant failed to prove manufacturing use through independent evidence, the tenancy was treated as month-to-month, making the 15-day notice valid, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court and Trial Court's possession decree in the landlady's favour.

Lesson Learnt

An unregistered lease deed for a fixed term of more than a year cannot be relied upon in court to prove its own terms (like duration or purpose) when that very term is the main dispute: a tenant wanting the protection of a longer notice period must prove the property's actual use independently, not merely by pointing to what an unregistered document says.

M/S Paul Rubber Industries Private Limited vs. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware