Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Consumer RightsSupreme Court of India

M/S Siddhyvinayak Infrastructure vs Kamalakar Jayant Srivastava

Civil AppealDecided 12 Aug 2022
Civil Appeal No. 5208 of 2022
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · J.B. Pardiwala · Aniruddha Bose

Background

A homebuyer in Nagpur had agreed in 2006 to buy a twin bungalow from a developer for about Rs. 9.74 lakh, with part of the price to be funded by a bank loan. The loan was sanctioned but never disbursed because required documents were not furnished, and a dispute arose over whether the buyer or the developer was at fault. The District Consumer Forum ordered the developer to complete construction and hand over possession; on revision, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission modified this, directing the developer to hand over possession after obtaining an occupation certificate and the buyer to pay the balance price. The developer appealed to the Supreme Court, and the buyer did not appear at all to contest the appeal.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court declined to rule on the correctness of the National Commission's order, noting the unusual facts: 16 years had passed since the original 2006 agreement, the buyer had never paid the balance sale consideration despite the loan being available in 2006, and the buyer did not even appear before the Supreme Court to defend the order in his favour. Given this, the Court held it would be unjust to force the developer to execute the sale deed at this late stage. Instead, it modified the National Commission's order so that the developer need only refund a sum of Rs. 3,24,780 (which had earlier been deposited as a condition of stay) with 12% interest from the date of the original agreement, after which the developer would have no further liability regarding the property.

Lesson Learnt

Courts will not force specific performance of a long-delayed property transaction, especially where the consumer has not diligently pursued their own obligations (such as paying the balance price) or even appeared to defend a favourable order: practical justice, not rigid enforcement, guides relief after such prolonged inaction.

M/S Siddhyvinayak Infrastructure vs Kamalakar Jayant Srivastava – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware