Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThis batch of appeals (led by Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation, and including the Tuticorin Thermal Power Plant and other industrial users in Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu) challenged a National Green Tribunal order. The Tribunal had found that forest land diverted in 2008 for an intake well meant only for "drinking water" purposes was instead being used by the TWAD Board to also supply water to industries, in violation of the forest clearance conditions, and had restricted the water to drinking-use only. The industries argued this caused severe operational hardship, while the original complainant (S. Joel) argued that rainfall data showed real drinking-water scarcity in the district, so industrial diversion should not be allowed.
The Supreme Court rejected the appellants' argument that the original 2008 forest-clearance permission never actually barred industrial use, holding that the clearance was granted only under the "drinking water" category of the Government's forest-diversion guidelines. Rather than simply deciding how much water could go to industry, the Court set up a practical, time-bound administrative mechanism: the District Collector of Thoothukudi was directed to convene stakeholder meetings, independently verify the Water Board's data on surplus water, and conduct fortnightly reviews to decide whether any surplus (beyond full drinking-water needs) could be released for industrial use, including to the Tuticorin Thermal Power Plant. The Court also directed TWAD Board, the State Government and the Union Ministry of Environment to complete, within fixed timelines, the formal regulatory process for seeking clearance to use the water for both purposes. The batch of appeals was disposed of on these terms, with no order as to costs.
When environmental and public-necessity interests (drinking water) collide with industrial/economic interests, courts may decline to pick a side outright and instead create an accountable, time-bound local verification mechanism (here, the District Collector) to balance the competing claims on the ground, rather than attempting to resolve disputed factual questions like water availability from the bench.
